I just have to comment on the last episode of Mad Men.
A curious side-effect to the episode is that it has put me at playful odds with my friends. Many of us have our favorite characters, and we’ve all taken sides and preferences with different characters in the show. In my small circle of Mad-Men-watching-friends, we have a Roger Sterling, a Betty Draper, a Peggy Olsen, 2 Joan Holloways, and a Don Draper. I’m Don Draper.

Alcohol dependence included.
In this circle the sense of identification with the characters doesn’t come from an acknowledgement of superficial parallels or personal idealism. All the characters have terrible faults and have made harmful decisions throughout the show, so it’s hard to idealize someone with others who consistently err as humans do. Rather, the identification comes from an understanding of how the character views the world around him, based on circumstances of the present.
As a Don empathizer, I’m glad the divorce between Betty and Don came through. I honestly am. And I’m glad Don finally does, too. I don’t deny that there was once love between the characters, but even that love was built on delusions of grandeur from both parties. Don met her not long after he returned to the states from the war, and he picked Betty (a young, beautiful, professional model with a Grace Kelly mug) more as a compliment to the idealized character he was building, and less as a romantic partner.
Betty, on the other hand, is completely complacent with her place as a visual object, and much like the modeling life she knows (and misses), she expects to be continually worshipped for her looks. It’s no secret she values aesthetic appearance most in herself and others (her daughter surviving the car accident with a scar is “worse” than death, she’s constantly worried her daughter looks fat, etc) and that blatant narcissism blocks her from any sense of mental depth or sympathy towards others.
And people like that piss me off. I’m glad Don called her out on being a terrible wife and mother, though it’s a shame it didn’t hit another nerve within her. In the closing scenes, she was off to Reno with a man she hardly knows, leaving her older kids with the nanny for 6 week. Mother-of-the-year, ladies and gentlemen. But, really, who just stands up and does that? Don cheated on her before, and she didn’t leave. Is it because she finds out he used to be poor and her picture-perfect social status doesn’t exist anymore? (“I’ve seen how you are with money. You don’t know what to do with it.” Bitch, didn’t seem to be a problem before!)

Say what now?
Kudos to Henry for stepping up, though, I didn’t think he would. If he’s willing to commit to worshipping her for the rest of his life maybe that partnership can work in the long run. For Don’s sake, good riddance. He can and should (and finally, wants to) do better.
With the changes at Sterling-Cooper (or Sterling-Cooper-Draper-Price-Campbell? How do you fit that shit on a masthead?) and a pending divorce, Don stands at the eve of personal redefinition. Since the beginning of the series, Don has served as a mask for Dick Whitman, that scared little kid who never went away (made apparent by using rolling flashbacks to his youth). The man is not “jaded,” but how else can a mask feel emotion? It’s why he performs harmful acts like he does (has affairs, leaves his job for weeks without notice, etc) without repercussions. Yet, as he looked upon the hotel room where everyone has followed him out, he realizes he can create something better from scratch. Hence, he immediately walks into the bedroom and tells Betty to piss off to Reno, and to take the kids with her. Until now, Dick has paraded Don as a costume, but I sense the beginning of a final fuse of the man and the mask. I cannot wait to see what comes of it.
Now, off to hear the points of view from the other characters. Will my Betty Draper friends care to speak up?





















Recent Comments